A Glossary of Key Terms in AI Ethics & Governance for HR and Recruiting Professionals

The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into human resources and recruiting processes offers unprecedented efficiencies, from automating resume screening to personalizing candidate experiences. However, leveraging AI effectively and responsibly requires a deep understanding of the ethical considerations and governance frameworks that ensure fairness, transparency, and accountability. This glossary provides HR and recruiting professionals with essential definitions to navigate the complexities of AI, fostering trust, mitigating risks, and maximizing the positive impact of these transformative technologies within their organizations.

AI Ethics

AI Ethics refers to the set of moral principles and values that guide the design, development, deployment, and use of artificial intelligence systems. For HR and recruiting, this means actively considering the societal and human impact of AI tools used in talent acquisition, employee management, and performance evaluations. Ethical AI practices in HR aim to prevent harm, promote fairness, protect privacy, and ensure human oversight, moving beyond mere compliance to foster an equitable and trustworthy workplace. Implementing strong AI ethics helps organizations maintain a positive employer brand and avoid potential legal and reputational damage stemming from biased or opaque AI decisions.

AI Governance

AI Governance encompasses the policies, procedures, and oversight mechanisms established to manage the risks and opportunities associated with AI systems. In an HR context, this involves creating clear guidelines for how AI tools are selected, implemented, monitored, and updated for tasks like candidate screening, skill assessment, or employee engagement surveys. Effective AI governance ensures that AI systems align with organizational values, regulatory requirements (like GDPR or emerging AI acts), and ethical principles. It includes defining roles and responsibilities, conducting regular audits, and establishing feedback loops to address issues, thereby safeguarding both the organization and its people from adverse AI outcomes.

Algorithmic Bias

Algorithmic bias occurs when an AI system produces unfair or discriminatory outcomes due to flaws in its design, the data it was trained on, or the way it’s used. In HR, this could manifest as an AI recruiting tool inadvertently favoring or disadvantaging certain demographic groups based on historical hiring data that reflected existing biases. For instance, if past successful candidates were predominantly male, an AI might learn to disproportionately score male applicants higher, even if gender is irrelevant to job performance. Identifying and mitigating algorithmic bias is crucial for HR professionals to ensure equitable hiring practices, promote diversity, and comply with anti-discrimination laws, preventing talented candidates from being overlooked.

Algorithmic Transparency

Algorithmic transparency refers to the ability to understand how an AI system makes its decisions. While AI models can be complex, HR professionals need a degree of transparency to explain decisions made by AI tools, especially when those decisions impact a candidate’s or employee’s career. For example, if an AI screens out a candidate, transparency means understanding the criteria and data points that led to that outcome, rather than simply accepting a black-box result. This doesn’t necessarily mean revealing proprietary algorithms but rather providing clear explanations of the factors influencing AI outputs. It builds trust, allows for dispute resolution, and helps identify and correct potential biases, improving the fairness of HR processes.

Accountability (in AI)

Accountability in AI refers to the obligation to explain and take responsibility for the actions and outcomes of AI systems. In HR, this means that even if an AI tool makes a hiring recommendation or flags a performance issue, human stakeholders ultimately bear the responsibility for the decisions made and their impact on individuals. Establishing clear lines of accountability—identifying who is responsible for the AI’s performance, data quality, ethical implications, and compliance—is critical. This ensures that when issues arise, there are designated individuals or teams to investigate, rectify, and prevent recurrence, fostering responsible AI deployment and ensuring that human judgment remains paramount in sensitive HR decisions.

Fairness (in AI)

Fairness in AI is the principle that AI systems should treat individuals and groups equitably, without prejudice or discrimination. For HR and recruiting, achieving AI fairness means ensuring that AI tools used in hiring, promotion, or talent management do not perpetuate or amplify existing societal biases. This involves rigorous testing for disparate impact across different demographic groups, using diverse and representative training data, and implementing safeguards to correct for identified unfairness. HR professionals must define what “fairness” means for their organization, consider various dimensions (e.g., equal opportunity, equal outcome), and continuously monitor AI systems to ensure they contribute to an inclusive and equitable workplace, enhancing workforce diversity.

Privacy by Design

Privacy by Design is an approach to systems engineering that incorporates privacy considerations into the entire development lifecycle of a product or service, rather than adding them as an afterthought. In the context of AI in HR, this means designing AI tools and processes from the outset to minimize the collection of personal data, anonymize data where possible, and securely store and process all sensitive information. For instance, an AI-powered resume parser would be designed to only extract relevant skills and experience, not sensitive personal details unless absolutely necessary and with explicit consent. Implementing Privacy by Design helps HR comply with data protection regulations (like GDPR) and builds trust with candidates and employees by demonstrating a commitment to protecting their personal information.

Data Protection

Data protection refers to the laws, policies, and technical measures designed to safeguard personal and sensitive information from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, alteration, or destruction. In AI-powered HR, data protection is paramount as AI systems often process vast amounts of candidate and employee data, including resumes, performance reviews, and demographic information. HR professionals must ensure that AI vendors and internal systems adhere to strict data protection standards, including secure data storage, access controls, encryption, and compliance with regulations like GDPR or CCPA. Robust data protection practices not only ensure legal compliance but also maintain candidate and employee trust, which is essential for successful talent acquisition and retention.

Explainable AI (XAI)

Explainable AI (XAI) refers to methods and techniques that allow humans to understand the output of AI models. Unlike traditional “black-box” AI, XAI aims to make AI decisions interpretable and transparent, which is critical in high-stakes applications like HR. For a recruiting manager, an XAI system might not just recommend a candidate but also explain *why* that candidate was recommended, highlighting specific skills, experiences, or qualifications that align with the job description. This human-readable explanation empowers HR professionals to validate AI decisions, identify potential biases, justify their own choices to candidates or employees, and confidently intervene if an AI recommendation seems incorrect, promoting confidence in AI tools.

Human-in-the-Loop (HITL)

Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) is an approach to AI development and deployment where human intelligence is integrated into the machine learning cycle to improve the system’s accuracy and reliability. In HR, this means that while AI can automate initial screening or data analysis, human oversight and intervention remain crucial for complex or sensitive decisions. For example, an AI might pre-screen hundreds of resumes, but a recruiter reviews the top candidates to make the final selection and conduct interviews. HITL ensures that AI acts as an assistant rather than a replacement for human judgment, combining the efficiency of automation with the nuanced understanding, ethical reasoning, and empathy that only humans can provide in critical HR processes.

Responsible AI

Responsible AI is an overarching framework that integrates ethical principles, governance structures, and practical measures to ensure AI systems are developed and used in a way that is beneficial, fair, transparent, and accountable. For HR and recruiting, adopting a Responsible AI approach means proactively addressing potential risks like bias and privacy breaches while maximizing the positive impacts of AI, such as improved efficiency and more objective candidate assessments. It involves establishing guidelines for data quality, model testing, human oversight, and continuous monitoring. This holistic approach helps organizations build trust, comply with regulations, and harness AI’s power to create more equitable and effective talent management strategies, aligning tech with human values.

Algorithmic Discrimination

Algorithmic discrimination refers to unfair or prejudicial treatment of individuals or groups resulting from the use of algorithms, often due to inherent biases in the data used to train the AI. In HR, this is a serious concern, as AI systems could inadvertently discriminate based on protected characteristics (e.g., age, gender, race) if not carefully designed and monitored. For instance, an AI tool used to filter job applications might learn to favor candidates from certain universities if historical data shows a bias towards those institutions, inadvertently excluding equally qualified candidates from other backgrounds. Recognizing and actively mitigating algorithmic discrimination is a legal and ethical imperative for HR, ensuring equitable access to opportunities.

AI Audit

An AI audit is a systematic evaluation of an AI system to assess its performance, fairness, compliance with regulations, and adherence to ethical guidelines. For HR professionals, regular AI audits are essential to ensure that AI tools used in hiring, performance management, or employee engagement are functioning as intended and not introducing unintended biases or legal risks. Audits can involve examining the training data, analyzing algorithm outputs for discriminatory patterns, verifying data security measures, and assessing the effectiveness of human oversight mechanisms. Conducting independent or internal AI audits provides assurance, identifies areas for improvement, and demonstrates an organization’s commitment to responsible AI deployment.

Ethical AI Framework

An Ethical AI Framework is a structured set of principles, policies, and practices that an organization adopts to guide the responsible development and deployment of AI technologies. For HR, such a framework might include principles like human oversight, fairness, transparency, privacy, and accountability, tailored to the specific context of people management. It provides clear guidelines for selecting AI vendors, evaluating AI tools, training HR staff on AI use, and establishing remediation processes when issues arise. Implementing an Ethical AI Framework helps HR teams proactively address ethical dilemmas, mitigate risks, and ensure that AI initiatives align with the organization’s values and legal obligations, fostering a principled approach to innovation.

Model Drift

Model drift, also known as concept drift, occurs when the relationship between the input data and the target variable that an AI model was trained to predict changes over time. In HR, this could mean that an AI-powered resume screening tool, initially highly effective, might become less accurate if job roles evolve, industry skill requirements shift, or the demographic profile of applicants changes significantly. For example, a model trained on traditional resumes might perform poorly with new, skills-based profiles. HR professionals must regularly monitor AI model performance and be prepared to retrain or update models to account for drift, ensuring that AI tools remain relevant, accurate, and fair in a dynamic talent landscape.

If you would like to read more, we recommend this article: AI for HR: Achieve 40% Less Tickets & Elevate Employee Support